Now launching · State Street pilot · days until public comment An independent citizens' coalition · Add your name →
Just launched · Public comment to City Council June 2, 2026

Salt Lake City shouldn't have to lose sleep over this.

We're neighbors asking the City to put 40 noise sensors on State Street, publish what they find every night, and let the data — not enforcement — do the work.

Corridor
20 blocks
State Street, North Temple to 900 South
Sensors
40
Mounted to existing light & signal poles
Pilot length
12 months
Quarterly public reports to council
Estimated cost
$95K–180K
What we're asking the city to fund · largely grant-eligible
01 · Why this matters

Nighttime vehicle noise is a measurable health issue.

Decades of peer-reviewed research show that loud motorcycle revving and cars with modified mufflers cruising late at night disrupts sleep, raises cardiovascular risk, and costs employers measurable productivity. Salt Lake City's densest residential corridors are routinely exposed above WHO night-time guidelines.

Simulation · trace a peak event
See what one nighttime noise event looks like across the corridor.

A short interactive simulation walks a single peak event through the sensor network — the same view the public dashboard would surface, so you can judge for yourself what continuous measurement actually shows.

Launch simulation

Nighttime noise fragments restorative sleep — whether or not you remember waking.

"I don't remember waking up. I just remember being exhausted by Wednesday." — what residents along the corridor describe, again and again.

Repeated peak events at night produce cortical micro-arousals that degrade sleep architecture and reduce slow-wave (deep) sleep retention. The damage accumulates across weeks and years, even when sleepers are not consciously aware of being woken.

In Salt Lake City, residents of Central City, the Granary District, Ballpark, and downtown report fragmented sleep at rates well above outer-neighborhood baselines — consistent with the pattern in every published study of urban exposure corridors.

Muzet (2007); Basner & McGuire (2018). Dose–response relationships between nighttime transportation noise and measurable sleep disturbance.

×3.4
Cortical micro-arousals per hour at 60 dB peak events vs. quiet baseline.
−18%
Slow-wave (deep) sleep retention in exposed groups across multi-night studies.
+22%
Self-reported daytime fatigue among residents of high-exposure corridors.
02 · The proposal

What we're asking the City to do.

Authorize and fund a twelve-month, phased pilot. Phase one deploys 40 calibrated noise sensors along State Street. Phase two publishes what they find on a public dashboard. We are not asking for any new citation authority or individual identification — just measurement and transparency.

Phase 01 · Months 0–4 (if approved)

Deploy a distributed sensor network.

Forty calibrated A-weighted sound monitors, mounted to existing city-owned light and signal poles along State Street between North Temple and 900 South — with city authorization.

  • Continuous, time-stamped, geo-located measurement at one-second resolution
  • Peak-event detection separates discrete loud events from ambient flow
  • Baseline exposure established before any dashboard is published
  • No microphones recording speech; no images or license plates ever captured
Sensors · Connectivity · Baseline
Phase 02 · Months 4–12 (if approved)

Publish the data through a public dashboard.

Real-time heat maps, historical trends, and peak exposure periods — aggregated at the block level, accessible to every Salt Lake City resident through any browser.

  • Open access on the public web — we will request hosting on a slc.gov subdomain
  • Educational outreach with neighborhood associations and community councils
  • Quarterly plain-language reports to the City Council and the public
  • Anonymized data available for researchers under Utah's public-records framework
Dashboard · Outreach · Reporting
03 · The pilot corridor

Forty sensors across twenty downtown blocks.

The pilot corridor follows State Street from North Temple to 900 South, with sensor density doubled along the central thoroughfare. Coverage is intentionally even across the corridor — no neighborhood is prioritized over another.

Sensor placement · pilot corridor · indicative 40 calibrated sensors · State Street corridor
Microphone sensor (×40) Co-located UDOT traffic camera (×9) Aggregate nighttime exposure · low → high Hover or tap any sensor for live cam + reading
Pilot corridor
State StreetFrom North Temple to 900 South · twenty contiguous downtown blocks
Council districts
District 3 & 4Plus adjacent edges of Districts 5 and 2
Mounting
Existing infrastructureSLC-owned light poles and traffic signals — no new construction
Connectivity
Cellular & LP-WANNo on-street wiring, no curb work required
Coverage equity
Equal densityTwo sensors per block across the entire corridor area
04 · The public dashboard

Block-level transparency, aggregated by design.

All data is aggregated at the block level before it is published. No individual vehicle is ever identified. The dashboard is the policy mechanism — and it works because the underlying data is open, auditable, and continuously updated.

UQI-ST-03 · 200 S & State Urban Acoustics · v0.1
Central City Streaming · 48 kHz · A-weighted
Threshold ≥ 75 dB 08:20:43 admin@localAdmin
Year avg
52.4dB
Rolling 365-day LAeq
Threshold breaches
1hrs ≥ 75 dB
Past 365 days
Loudest day
115.1dB
May 16
Modal peak hour
03:00
weekday rush + nightlife bleed
Anomalies flagged
500z ≥ 2.9
Past 365 days
Live · Right now Streaming
49.1
dB(A) · LAeq
1 s ago
Anomalies feed 500 events · past 365 days
Live
Elevated May 2618:00 Motorcyclez = 2.98 · +9.5 dB vs baseline 65.6dB
High May 2618:00 Carz = 3.26 · +10.4 dB vs baseline 66.7dB
Elevated May 2522:14 Motorcyclez = 2.91 · sustained >30 s 71.2dB
2026 May May 20
Day
Within threshold Wednesday, May 20 2026-05-20 · 24/24 hrs reported
Threshold ≥ 75 dB
Day peak
99.2dB · 14:00
Day avg
60.9dB · LAeq
Breach hours
0hrs ≥ 75 dB
Coverage
24/24hrs reported
24-hour spectrogram · 2026-05-20 click a tile to replay · breach ≥ 75 dB
Labeled Unlabeled Annotation
Day events108 events for Wednesday, May 20 · pick one to play & label
82.0dB May 19, 18:00:19
11.0 s · car
Available
80.7dB May 19, 18:08:55
11.0 s · motorcycle
Available
78.2dB May 19, 18:12:13
10.0 s · motorcycle
Available
82.3dB May 19, 18:13:26
9.4 s · truck
Available
7-day forecast Model v3
Weekly seasonality + event calendar. Shaded band = 95% CI.
Peak hours mean dB by hour-of-day · past 365 days
Breach ribbon hrs ≥ threshold / day
365 days · Intensity of ≥75 dB hours

Note: This is a working preview built by the coalition using synthetic data, to show what a live dashboard could look like. The real dashboard would launch four months after the City Council approves and funds the pilot — hosted publicly under a domain determined together with the City.

05 · Frequently asked

Common questions from residents.

The five most-asked questions, with direct answers. Three more — on enforcement, cost, and what happens after twelve months — live on the full proposal page. If you have a question that's not here, write to us through the form below.

No. The Urban Quiet Initiative is an independent coalition of Salt Lake City residents. We are not part of the Mayor's Office, the City Council, or any city department, and we do not speak on the City's behalf.

Our role is to make the case — publicly, with evidence — that this pilot is worth funding, and to petition the City Council to authorize and fund it. We welcome any city department that wants to engage with us; we will not claim their endorsement unless they give it.

No. As proposed, the sensors measure A-weighted sound levels — a number representing loudness — not the audio itself. There is no microphone capturing or transmitting speech, music, or conversations. Each sensor reports values like "67 dB at 11:42 PM" and nothing more.

This is a hardware-level guarantee written into the petition: the specified devices do not have the capability to record audio in the first place.

State Street between North Temple and 900 South is one of the densest mixed-use corridors in Salt Lake City and consistently appears among the most-complained-about nighttime corridors in the Salt Lake County Health Department's noise records. It is a strong, evidence-rich starting point for a pilot.

If the pilot succeeds, the framework is intentionally scalable — we expect to publish the methodology so that other Wasatch Front corridors can adopt it. Sensor coverage in other neighborhoods would be a future phase, not a competing one.

No. The Urban Quiet Initiative does not, and cannot, create any new citation authority — we are a citizens' coalition, not a government body. The petition we are bringing to the City Council explicitly opposes any expansion of punitive enforcement, and asks that dashboard data not be used to identify specific vehicles.

The research underlying the proposal consistently shows that public information disclosure changes behavior on its own — through visibility, social norms, and reputational incentives.

Everyone, if the pilot is funded. The proposal is for a public website with no login required — ideally hosted on a slc.gov subdomain. Anyone — residents, journalists, researchers, business owners — would see corridor-level noise patterns by block, by hour, and by day of the week.

Anonymized, block-aggregated data would also be available for download under Utah's existing public-records framework, so independent researchers can verify the City's reporting.

06 · Get involved

Four ways to make this happen.

Sign-ups just opened. On June 2, 2026, we'll be at City Council during public comment to introduce this proposal — and to start building the record that the data, the corridor, and the residents care about it. Awareness is the policy — the more of us show up, the harder it is to ignore.

01
Sign the petition.
Takes 30 seconds. Open through June 1, 2026 · delivered the next morning to the City Council.
Sign →
02
Tell us about your block.
A story, a recording, a complaint case number — anything that helps us make the case. Goes straight to the coalition.
Send →
03
Speak at the Council meeting.
June 2, 2026 · 7:00 p.m. · City & County Building, 451 S State St · public comment is welcomed.
Details →
04
Share with a neighbor.
Awareness is the policy. The more residents who know, the harder this is for the Council to defer.
Share →
Council watch · Where each member stands
Council Member, District 3
Covers central pilot corridor
Considering
Council Member, District 4
Covers central pilot corridor
Considering
Five other council members
Citywide
No response yet
07 · Feedback

Tell us about your block.

A story, data, a concern — anything that helps us make the case. Specific is better than general. Every message reaches the coalition directly.